September 21, 2017 1 COMMENTS

GOP, Dems both lack solution to CT's cycle of budget deficits

Despite their many disagreements over how the next state budget should look, Republican and Democratic legislators have one key element in common.

Neither of their respective plans would spare Connecticut from grappling with another massive budget deficit two years from now.

The legislature's nonpartisan Office of Fiscal Analysis says the two-year budget crafted by Republican legislators and passed in the House and Senate late last week would balance the state's books this fiscal year and next — wiping out a $3.5 billion deficit in the process.

But that same plan, unless adjusted, would run $3.31 billion in the red between 2019 and 2021.

And the alternative budget developed by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and Democratic legislative leadership would fare even worse, with a potential shortfall of $3.58 billion.

In other words, when Connecticut's next governor arrives at the Capitol in January 2019, that person and the General Assembly effectively would face the same challenge that has confounded Malloy and legislators for the past eight months. And that's after taking into account the wide array of spending cuts and tax hikes both sides have built into their latest budget plans.

That's in part because Connecticut still must deal with surging debt and retirement benefit costs — much of which stems from more than seven decades of insufficient savings. This problem is projected to plague state finances through the mid-2030s.

"I know this has been a tough year," House Minority Leader Themis Klarides, R-Derby, said early Saturday morning during a debate that ended when five Democrats joined all 72 Republicans to send the GOP's two-year budget to Malloy's desk. "And guess what? Next year is going to be a tough year. And the year after that is going to be a tough year. We don't really see an end in sight. But what we know is we have some tough choices to make."

Rep. Jason Rojas, D-East Hartford, House chairman of the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, noted that the Republican budget carries no more promise that Connecticut's fiscal crisis is over in two years than the Democratic plan does.

But Klarides said the Republican proposal is accompanied by key structural changes, including more stringent caps on spending and borrowing, that will begin to whittle down deficits over time.

Rep. Chris Davis of Ellington, ranking GOP representative on the finance panel, questioned the reliability of nonpartisan analysts' assessment of the Republican budget.

The Office of Fiscal Analysis "cannot accurately estimate economic growth that potentially could come from a budget that does not feature massive tax increases," Davis said.

The Republican budget would order tax and fee hikes that would raise an extra $840 million across this fiscal year and next, compared with a Democratic plan that orders $1.53 billion in increases.

The largest hike in both plans would increase hospital taxes by $688 million over the biennium. All of those funds would be returned to the industry, along with some additional state payments, to leverage hundreds of millions of dollars in additional federal Medicaid payments to Connecticut.

Malloy has said he will veto the Republican plan, citing several problems. The governor says that budget would:

  • Unilaterally reduce employee pension benefits after mid-2027 and reap some of the savings now, reducing pension contributions by $321 million across this fiscal year and next.
  • Impose excessive cuts on public colleges and universities.
  • Cut income tax relief for the working poor by $150 million.
  • Provide insufficient aid to Hartford to avert insolvency.
  • And require the governor to find $260 million more in undefined savings after the budget is in force than the Democratic plan would demand.
Comments

Type your comment here:

Had Enough

09/22/17 AT 08:27 AM
It's amazing that all these politicians can't even comprehend what any business owner knows. It's not about taxes or revenue! It's simply a spending issue. Cut every state budget by 7 to 10%. If you think savings can't be found by removing the fat and inefficiency to the tune of 10% then you need to go. Everyone on the outside sees gross inefficiency with every state department they have contact with. Get real or step aside!
Free E-Newsletters

Sign up now for our daily and weekly
e-newsletters! Click Here

 
Today's Poll Is Connecticut a smart location for a second Amazon headquarters?<>
ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Popular on Facebook
Copyright 2017 New England Business Media