March 11, 2010

Sign In
  1. Forgot Password? | New Account

Browse News by Topic

Data Products

To Do List

Awards & Events

Bookmark and Share

U.S. high court rules for white CT firefighters

06/29/09


The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that white firefighters in New Haven were unfairly denied promotions because of their race, reversing a decision that high court nominee Sonia Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge.On Jan. 9, attorney Karen Torre, front left, spoks to the media on the steps of the New Haven federal courthouse with Frank Ricci, front right, the lead plaintiff in the the

New Haven was wrong to scrap a promotion exam because no African-Americans and only two Hispanic firefighters were likely to be made lieutenants or captains based on the results, the court said today in a 5-4 decision. The city said that it had acted to avoid a lawsuit from minorities.

The ruling could alter employment practices nationwide, potentially limiting the circumstances in which employers can be held liable for decisions when there is no evidence of intentional discrimination against minorities.

"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his opinion for the court. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.

In dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the white firefighters "understandably attract this court's sympathy. But they had no vested right to promotion. Nor have other persons received promotions in preference to them."

Justices Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens signed onto Ginsburg's dissent, which she read aloud in court Monday.

Kennedy's opinion made only passing reference to the work of Sotomayor and the other two judges on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals who upheld a lower court ruling in favor of New Haven.

But the appellate judges have been criticized for producing a cursory opinion that failed to deal with "indisputably complex and far from well-settled" questions, in the words of another appeals court judge, Sotomayor mentor Jose Cabranes.

"This perfunctory disposition rests uneasily with the weighty issues presented by this appeal," Cabranes said, in a dissent from the full 2nd Circuit's decision not to hear the case.

Today's decision has its origins in New Haven's need to fill vacancies for lieutenants and captains in its fire department. It hired an outside firm to design a test, which was given to 77 candidates for lieutenant and 41 candidates for captain.

Fifty six firefighters passed the exams, including 41 whites, 22 blacks and 18 Hispanics. But of those, only 17 whites and two Hispanics could expect promotion.

Reader response:

"Amen! Finally someone had the courage to stand behind the fact that with Affirmative Action, the whites are being discriminated against. I personally do not favor discrimination, but there are so many things that whites are not allowed to be considered for because of our race.'' -- Doris Mauro, Jafra Cosmetics Int'l 

"All men are created equal." All means all. The Supreme Court vote should have been 9-0.'' -- Michael Hicks, Opus Communications

"I don't know what the all the fuss is about. People took a test and X amount passed.
Move forward from there with the promotions, I truely hate to say it, but if enough blacks instead of whites passed this wouldn't even be on our radar. Does tort reform ring any bells?'' -- David Laraia, David Michael Companies LLC 

 
Comments | To post a comment, you must register. | View our Comment FAQ.

This article does not currently have any comments

Post A Comment
Returning User? Please login.
Forgot your password?

or

New to our site? Please create an account (Why?)
Security Code

Please enter the code shown below
(this helps us prevent spam)